|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 13-16
A brief review on the efficacy of different possible and nonpharmacological techniques in eliminating discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures
Amin Davoudi1, Mansour Rismanchian2, Ali Akhavan3, Saeid Nosouhian2, Farshad Bajoghli2, Abbas Haghighat4, Farahnaz Arbabzadeh5, Pouran Samimi5, Atiyeh Fiez5, Elham Shadmehr3, Kasra Tabari6, Sanaz Jahadi3
1 Dental Students Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Implants Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Endodontics, Torabinejad Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Implants Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
5 Department of Operative Dentistry, Torabinejad Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
6 Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
|Date of Web Publication||12-Jan-2016|
Dental Implant Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezarjarib Street, Isfahan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Dental anxiety and fear of needle injection is one of the most common problems encountered by dental practitioners, especially in the pediatric patient. In consequences, it might affect the patient's quality of life. Several methods are suggested to lower the discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures. Desensitization of injection site is one of the recommended strategies. Among chemical anesthetic topical agents that are effective but might have allergic side effects, using some nonpharmacological and safe techniques might be useful. This study aimed to overview the efficacy of using cooling techniques, mostly by ice or popsicles, warming or pH buffering of drug, and using modern devices to diminish the discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures.
Keywords: Dental anesthesia, injection, pain, vibration
|How to cite this article:|
Davoudi A, Rismanchian M, Akhavan A, Nosouhian S, Bajoghli F, Haghighat A, Arbabzadeh F, Samimi P, Fiez A, Shadmehr E, Tabari K, Jahadi S. A brief review on the efficacy of different possible and nonpharmacological techniques in eliminating discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures. Anesth Essays Res 2016;10:13-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Davoudi A, Rismanchian M, Akhavan A, Nosouhian S, Bajoghli F, Haghighat A, Arbabzadeh F, Samimi P, Fiez A, Shadmehr E, Tabari K, Jahadi S. A brief review on the efficacy of different possible and nonpharmacological techniques in eliminating discomfort of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures. Anesth Essays Res [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 May 27];10:13-6. Available from: http://www.aeronline.org/text.asp?2016/10/1/13/167846
| Introduction|| |
Needle injection of the local anesthetics may induce fear and anxiety to some patients, especially during dental procedures. The feeling of needle being attached to a syringe and penetrating the oral mucosa is quite distressing and carries a negative impact on patient's psychology. Researches have shown that most of the patients postpone their dental visits primarily due to the fear of needles, pain and biting injury from injection., Poor pain control alongside the fear and anxiety of the needle might interfere with appropriate dental managements. So, profound local anesthesia is critical, and several methods are introduced to reduce pain during injection such as applying topical anesthetics pastes, warming or buffering the local anesthetic agents,, and slow inflation of local anesthetics. Furthermore, some studies have focused on cooling the injection site for better pain relief before or after local anesthetic injection. Also, vibration or pressure to the injection site by high-tech mechanical delivery systems has been tried out recently.
Topical anesthetic agents are common to apply prior to local anesthesia injection. They are presented in various chemical bases with different potent and clinical indication; therefore, toxic sequel due to over absorption by mucosa cannot be prohibited. Also, dissolution of these topical agents with saliva can impose negative impact on its anesthetic efficacy.
So, the aim of this study is to overview the possible, nonpharmacological, and common techniques to lower the pain of local anesthesia injection during dental procedures.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A data search was performed using PubMed's electronic database of dental reports, based on the following search terms in simple or multiple conjunctions: “Buffering,” “dental anesthesia,” “cooling,” “injection,” “pain,” “vibrating,” and “warming.” Some of the searched studies that had more relevance with the scope of this article were chosen. Consequently, case reports, studies with missing data, repeatedly published studies, and those in other languages than English were excluded. After screening both abstracts and full texts, the information was gathered for summarizing.
| Results and Discussion|| |
Mainly, the cooling technique is mostly attracted by researchers of different branches of medical sciences. Chan et al. surveyed the effect of precooling for skin laser treatments and observed lesser pain perception by their patients. The same statement was expressed by Leff et al. In another study, Kuwahara et al. compared the pain relief effects of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) (2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine cream) and ice prior to injection with a 30 gauge needle. They observed that clinically both EMLA and ice decreased the discomfort of needle injection. Moreover, several other studies stated that applying ice had caused reduction in pain perception.,,
How much efficient is precooling technique before local anesthesia injection?
As a matter of fact, there are not a vast published data on the effect of cooled injection site in dental procedures; however, this technique has get focused recently.
First, Harbert presented the idea of precooling technique for palatal injection technique. He observed that prior palatal cooling is efficient for relieved pain perception and claimed that cooling reaches the nerves through the tissue and blood supplies. Similar findings were reported by Duncan et al. who utilized a cotton pellet that was saturated by dichlorodifluoromethane spray as a cooling agent in contact with the tissue for 5 s before administrating palatal injection. Their final results revealed less discomfort during the needle penetration. In another study, Kosaraju and Vandewallecompared 5 s application of a refrigerant (1, 1, 1, 3, 3-pentafluoropropane/1, 1, 1,2-tetrafluoroethane) versus 2 min application of a topical anesthetic gel (20% benzocaine gel) before local anesthetic injection in the posterior palatal site with a 30-gauge needle. They found that refrigerant agent prior to anesthetic injection was more effective than that of topical anesthetic gel.
Ice popsicles can be an effective nonpharmacological intervention for pain management, and its analgesic effects can maintain for 30 min. Since 2009, two studies were conducted on pediatrics to evaluate the effect of precooling of injection site on the pain perceptions during the infiltration of local anesthesia. The final results clarified that the precooling technique significantly reduced the induced pain during injection., In another recent research, Wiswall et al. surveyed the patient's perceived pain response to different injection site preparation (pressure, pressure + topical anesthetic [20% benzocaine], and pressure + precooling) prior to greater palatine nerve block. That represented that there was no significant visual analog scale differences among test groups and all of them were effective.
Genuinely, there are small branches of arterioles and capillaries which supply the subepithelial network in such greater extension than skin. There is no arteriovenous shunts or venae comitantes in the palatal area and the vessels transfer cold more rapidly and deeply than skin. There is a theory called, “gate control theory,” which claims that applying cold decreases the neural transmission of the thin unmyelinated neurons that transfer stimuli from the periphery and reduces the pain by providing a continuous stimulus. So, according to that theory, cold application from a nonanesthetized region may arouse the cells that regulate pain pulses. Although there are different types of nerve fibers with different speeds, the cooling might decrease the velocity of each one to some proportions. Moreover, the mild pressure of the ice popsicle itself may produce other stimuli and reduce the pain. In other aspects, the local cooling causes vasoconstriction and reduces the tissue metabolism, the inflow of inflammatory mediators during penetration of needle. Also, as mentioned before, it stimulates myelinated Ad fibers, activating inhibitory pain pathways, which in turn raises the pain threshold, especially to noxious stimuli such as local anesthetic agents.
Discomfort after receiving dental anesthesia due to numbness is one of the unpleasant side effects of dental procedure, especially for pediatrics. Two different studies by Ram et al. was tried out to evaluate the efficacy of using ice or popsicles in reducing the discomfort or self-inflicting biting after receiving local anesthesia. The results manifested that the children were less restless  with lower self-inflicting biting.
As the ice temperature is not too low and prolonged ice contact to the vital tissues is not necessary, there is no need to worry. If any damages were observed, it might be due to immunological disease responsible. Ice is contraindicated in the case of hypersensitivity to cold. Also, other chemical cooling agents are not as safe as ice, for instance, 1, 1, 1,2-tetrafluoroethane with 10 s pressure appeared to make injurious to the oral mucosa.
Warming or buffering techniques
The rationale behind warming of local anesthesia before injection is related to a hypotheses which claim that warmed local anesthesia would accelerate the onset of sensory block by increasing the passive diffusion across nonneural structures and simultaneously increasing the nonionized (more penetrable) form of the local anesthetic drug. A systematic review was yield about the effectiveness of administering warmed local anesthesia during medical procedures and reported that warming of a local anesthetic would result in lesser pain induction during injection. Clinical dental trials about the efficacy of this techniques are few to prepare a comprehensive conclusion.
There are some technical advances to lower the pain of injection by alkalization of dental anesthetics prior to injection. There is a strong theory which clarifies that by adding the sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) to the anesthetic agents, an interaction would take place between NaHCO3 and the hydrochloric acid (HCL) in the local anesthetic which produces water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2). It has been reported that CO2 would provide an independent anesthetic effects that enhance the anesthetic's action sevenfold. The CO2 diffuses out of solution immediately after injection and potentiates the action of lidocaine by a direct depressant effect on the axons and results in changing of nerve's charge. However, clinical studies showed diverse results. Whitcomb et al. compared the clinical properties of administering buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine/NaHCO3 formulation and an unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine formulation. The result suggested no significant difference in the elimination of pain during injection. Similar results were notified by Saatchi et al. and Ram et al. in contrast to Kashyap et al. Maybe the study protocols and designs are the reason of various reported results.
Using modern devices or techniques
Injection and vibing
The vibration technique was first prescribed to minimize concurrent pain. The gate control theory of pain, which was explained previously, is the base of the analgesic effect of vibration. Vibration and touch receptors stimulate inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord and results in elimination of pain transmit information by A-δ and C fibers to the second-order neurons of the spinal cord.
Different brands and devices are available, in which the vibrating stimuli are produced such as VibraJect, DentalVibe, and Accupal. Released data about these devices are not vast enough. However, based on available executed studies, controversial effects of these systems are published. About VibraJect, two studies suggested using the device , in contrast to another study. The same controversy can be found about DentalVibe.,
Computer-aided delivery systems
One of the pain-induced factors is the volume and rate of drug infiltration. Therefore, computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) systems were designed for the better manipulation and delivery of local anesthesia. Most of the released researches support the efficacy of using these delivery systems in reducing the pain of local anesthesia injection.,,,
The mechanism of jet injectors is to create and release sufficient energy to push out the anesthetic drug through the soft-tissue without using any needle. They are supposed to induce no or little pain by injecting the drugs without needles by being fast and less irritative. According to the dental researches, they are not as much effective as expected and similar pain was induced during injection in comparison to conventional needle syringes.,
| Conclusion|| |
Since achieving an appropriate anesthesia is critical in modern dentistry and the needle phobia has become to an obstacle for clinicians, administrating desensitization techniques are suggested before needle injection. Among them, using ice or popsicles and CCLAD systems seems to be helpful. However, conducting more clinical trials and comparing each one of those discussed techniques to each other, which has not been executed until now, are strongly recommended to make a determinant recommendation.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Chhabra N, Chhabra A, Walia G. Prevalence of dental anxiety and fear among five to ten year Chhabra N, Chhabra A, Walia G. Prevalence of dental anxiety and fear among five to ten year old children: A behaviour based cross sectional study. Minerva Stomatol 2012;61:83-9.
Munshi AK, Hegde A, Bashir N. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of anesthesia and patient preference using the needle-less jet syringe in pediatric dental practice. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001;25:131-6.
Okawa K, Ichinohe T, Kaneko Y. Anxiety may enhance pain during dental treatment. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2005;46:51-8.
Tellez M, Potter CM, Kinner DG, Jensen D, Waldron E, Heimberg RG, et al.
Computerized tool to manage dental anxiety: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res 2015;94 9 Suppl: 174S-80S.
Al-Melh MA, Andersson L. Comparison of topical anesthetics (EMLA/Oraqix vs. benzocaine) on pain experienced during palatal needle injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:e16-20.
Hogan ME, vanderVaart S, Perampaladas K, Machado M, Einarson TR, Taddio A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of warming local anesthetics on injection pain. Ann Emerg Med 2011;58:86-98.e1.
Malamed SF, Falkel M. Buffered local anaesthetics: The importance of pH and CO2. SAAD Dig 2013;29:9-17.
Kanaa MD, Meechan JG, Corbett IP, Whitworth JM. Speed of injection influences efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve blocks: A double-blind randomized controlled trial in volunteers. J Endod 2006;32:919-23.
Ching D, Finkelman M, Loo CY. Effect of the DentalVibe injection system on pain during local anesthesia injections in adolescent patients. Pediatr Dent 2014;36:51-5.
Shilpapriya M, Jayanthi M, Reddy VN, Sakthivel R, Selvaraju G, Vijayakumar P. Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015;33:173-6.
Chan HH, Lam LK, Wong DS, Wei WI. Role of skin cooling in improving patient tolerability of Q-switched Alexandrite (QS Alex) laser in nevus of Ota treatment. Lasers Surg Med 2003;32:148-51.
Leff DR, Nortley M, Dang V, Bhutiani RP. The effect of local cooling on pain perception during infiltration of local anaesthetic agents, a prospective randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2007;62:677-82.
Kuwahara RT, Skinner RB. Emla versus ice as a topical anesthetic. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:495-6.
Goel S, Chang B, Bhan K, El-Hindy N, Kolli S. “Cryoanalgesic preparation” before local anaesthetic injection for lid surgery. Orbit 2006;25:107-10.
Harbert H. Topical ice: A precursor to palatal injections. J Endod 1989;15:27-8.
Duncan JD, Reeves GW, Fitchie JG. Technique to diminish discomfort from the palatal injection. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:901-2.
Kosaraju A, Vandewalle KS. A comparison of a refrigerant and a topical anesthetic gel as preinjection anesthetics: A clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:68-72.
Yagiz On A. Cold applications for the treatment of pain. Agri 2006;18:5-14.
Aminabadi NA, Farahani RM. The effect of pre-cooling the injection site on pediatric pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10:43-50.
Ghaderi F, Banakar S, Rostami S. Effect of pre-cooling injection site on pain perception in pediatric dentistry: “A randomized clinical trial”. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013;10:790-4.
Wiswall AT, Bowles WR, Lunos S, McClanahan SB, Harris S. Palatal anesthesia: Comparison of four techniques for decreasing injection discomfort. Northwest Dent 2014;93:25-9.
DeLeo JA. Basic science of pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88 Suppl 2:58-62.
Hsieh YL, Fan YC, Yang CC. Low-level laser therapy alleviates mechanical and cold allodynia induced by oxaliplatin administration in rats. Support Care Cancer 2015;5:1473-81.
Long RR. Cold fiber heat sensitivity: Dependency of “paradoxical” discharge on body temperature. Brain Res 1973;63:389-92.
Haghighat A, Davoudi A, Minaiyan M, Molai M, Afshar A, Basiri K. Effect of a trial pharmaceutical solution on reversing sensations after using lidocain: An animal study. Anesth Essays Res 2015;9:79-82.
Ram D, Efrat J, Michovitz N, Moskovitz M. The use of popsicles after dental treatment with local anesthesia in pediatric patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2006;31:41-3.
Ram D, Berson T, Moskovitz M, Efrat J. Unsweetened ice popsicles impart a positive feeling and reduce self-mutilation after paediatric dental treatment with local anaesthesia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010;20:382-8.
Liu FC, Liou JT, Day YJ, Li AH, Yu HP. Effect of warm lidocaine on the sensory onset of epidural anesthesia: A randomized trial. Chang Gung Med J 2009;32:643-9.
Malamed SF, Falkel M. Advances in local anesthetics: pH buffering and dissolved CO2. Dent Today 2012;31:88-93.
Primosch RE, Robinson L. Pain elicited during intraoral infiltration with buffered lidocaine. Am J Dent 1996;9:5-10.
Bokesch PM, Raymond SA, Strichartz GR. Dependence of lidocaine potency on pH and PCO2. Anesth Analg 1987;66:9-17.
Whitcomb M, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of sodium bicarbonate buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Anesth Prog 2010;57:59-66.
Saatchi M, Khademi A, Baghaei B, Noormohammadi H. Effect of sodium bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block for teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A prospective, randomized double-blind study. J Endod 2015;41:33-5.
Ram D, Hermida LB, Peretz B. A comparison of warmed and room-temperature anesthetic for local anesthesia in children. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:333-6.
Kashyap VM, Desai R, Reddy PB, Menon S. Effect of alkalinisation of lignocaine for intraoral nerve block on pain during injection, and speed of onset of anaesthesia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;49:e72-5.
Smith KC, Comite SL, Balasubramanian S, Carver A, Liu JF. Vibration anesthesia: A noninvasive method of reducing discomfort prior to dermatologic procedures. Dermatol Online J 2004;10:1.
Dickenson AH. Gate control theory of pain stands the test of time. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:755-7.
Saxena P, Gupta SK, Newaskar V, Chandra A. Advances in dental local anesthesia techniques and devices: An update. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013;4:19-24.
Nanitsos E, Vartuli R, Forte A, Dennison PJ, Peck CC. The effect of vibration on pain during local anaesthesia injections. Aust Dent J 2009;54:94-100.
Blair J. Vibraject from ITL dental. Dent Econ 2002;92:90.
Yoshikawa F, Ushito D, Ohe D, Shirasishi Y, Fukayama H, Umino M, et al
. Vibrating dental local anesthesia attachment to reduce injection pain. J Jpn Dent Soc Anesthesiol 2003;31:194-5.
Elbay M, Sermet Elbay Ü, Yildirim S, Ugurluel C, Kaya C, Baydemir C. Comparison of injection pain caused by the DentalVibe injection system versus a traditional syringe for inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia in paediatric patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2015;16:123-8.
Zhao X, Liu H, Qin M. Application of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system in children. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2011;29:389-92.
Yogesh Kumar TD, John JB, Asokan S, Geetha Priya PR, Punithavathy R, Praburajan V. Behavioral response and pain perception to computer controlled local anesthetic delivery system and cartridge syringe. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015;33:223-8.
Singh S, Garg A. Comparison of the pain levels of computer controlled and conventional anesthesia techniques in supraperiosteal injections: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:740-3.
Yenisey M. Comparison of the pain levels of computer-controlled and conventional anesthesia techniques in prosthodontic treatment. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:414-20.
Dabarakis NN, Alexander V, Tsirlis AT, Parissis NA, Nikolaos M. Needle-less local anesthesia: Clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of the jet anesthesia Injex in local anesthesia in dentistry. Quintessence Int 2007;38:E572-6.
Arapostathis KN, Dabarakis NN, Coolidge T, Tsirlis A, Kotsanos N. Comparison of acceptance, preference, and efficacy between jet injection Injex and local infiltration anesthesia in 6 to 11 year old dental patients. Anesth Prog 2010;57:3-12.
|This article has been cited by|
||Efficacy of dental local anesthetics: A review
| ||Nelly Badr,Johan Aps |
| ||Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2018; 18(6): 319 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Is the Use of Refrigerated Fixed Combination of Dorzolamide 2%–Timolol 0.5% (COSOPT) Associated with Less Ocular Discomfort? A Pilot Study
| ||Marija Bozic,Milenko Stojkovic,Miroslav Knezevic,Ivan Marjanovic,Anica Bobic-Radovanovic |
| ||Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The effect of adjusting the pH of local anaesthetics in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| ||P. V. Aulestia-Viera,M. M. Braga,M. A. Borsatti |
| ||International Endodontic Journal. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Influence of needle bevel design on injection pain and needle deformation in dental local infiltration anaesthesia – randomized clinical trial
| ||M. Dau,I. Buttchereit,C. Ganz,B. Frerich,E.N. Anisimova,M. Daubländer,P.W. Kämmerer |
| ||International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|