Anesthesia: Essays and Researches  Login  | Users Online: 131 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Home | About us | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Search | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Copyright form | Subscribe | Advertise | Contacts


 
Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 921-929  

A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and diltiazem for attenuating pressor responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: A double-blind, randomized study


1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Sasaram, Bihar, India
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, ELMCH, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication28-Nov-2017

Correspondence Address:
Raj Bahadur Singh
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Narayan Medical College and Hospital, Sasaram, Bihar
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_101_17

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Context: Endotracheal intubation has been suggested to be one of the most invasive stimuli in anesthesia, particularly during induction and after tracheal intubation. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as compared to diltiazem on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Aims: To assess and compare the hemodynamic response of dexmedetomidine as compared to diltiazem in patients undergoing laryngoscopy and intubation and rate and type of side effects of the drugs if any. Settings and Design: This study design was a prospective, randomized, and double-blind trial. Subjects and Methods: The patients were randomly allocated into three groups: Group I (control), Group II (dexmedetomidine), and Group III (diltiazem) of 45 patients each. Group I (n = 45): 0.9% NaCl 10 ml was given to the patients over 10 min before intubation in Group I (control). Group II (n = 45): injection dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg) in 10 ml normal saline was given to the patients over 10 min before intubation. Group III (n = 45): injection diltiazem (0.3 mg/kg) in 10 ml normal saline was given to the patients over 10 min before intubation. Statistical Analysis Used: The data so collected were subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 15.0. Results: Mean percentage increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) following intubation was 17.90%, 19.96%, and 19.04%, respectively, in control group, 9.04%, 6.32%, and 7.53%, respectively, in dexmedetomidine group, and 12.30%, 10.32%, and 11.14%, respectively, in diltiazem groups. Statistically, there was a significant difference in postintubation SBP, DBP, and MAP of the three groups (P < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5 μg/kg showed to have a better attenuation of pressor response as compared to diltiazem at a dose of 0.3 μg/kg. Conclusions: Both dexmedetomidine and diltiazem were safe and effective in attenuating the hemodynamic response following laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation; however, between two trial drugs, dexmedetomidine had a better response.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, diltiazem, intubation, laryngoscopy, pressure response


How to cite this article:
Singh RB, Ojha S, Choubey S. A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and diltiazem for attenuating pressor responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: A double-blind, randomized study. Anesth Essays Res 2017;11:921-9

How to cite this URL:
Singh RB, Ojha S, Choubey S. A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and diltiazem for attenuating pressor responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: A double-blind, randomized study. Anesth Essays Res [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 May 21];11:921-9. Available from: http://www.aeronline.org/text.asp?2017/11/4/921/214459






 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Subjects and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed945    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded88    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal