Anesthesia: Essays and Researches  Login  | Users Online: 1417 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Home | About us | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Search | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Copyright form | Subscribe | Advertise | Contacts


 
Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 803-808  

The effect of intravenous dexamethasone on intraoperative and early postoperative pain in lumbar spine surgery: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study


1 Department of Anaesthesiology, SMS Medical College and Attached Group of Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India

Date of Web Publication18-Dec-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shikha Gupta
1302, Vinay Path, Near Arjun Nagar, Underpass, Barkat Nagar, Jaipur - 302 015, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_115_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: The surgical procedures of spine are generally associated with intense pain in the postoperative period. Opioids are commonly used for perioperative analgesia but are associated with many side effects. Co-analgesic drugs are used to decrease these side effects. One such supplemental drug is dexamethasone. Its strong anti-inflammatory effect contributes to perioperative analgesia. Aim: This study was done to evaluate the effect of intravenous (i.v.) dexamethasone on intraoperative and early postoperative pain in lumbar spine surgery. Settings and Design: This was a hospital-based randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, done between June 2016 and December 2016 after permission of institutional ethical committee. Materials and Methods: This Study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery, and randomization was done in two groups. Group A (study) received dexamethasone 2 ml (8 mg) i.v. and Group B (control) received 2 ml normal saline. Anesthesia technique and rescue analgesia regimen were standardized. Intraoperative pain was assessed by hemodynamic variability and postoperative pain by verbal rating score. All the quantitative data were analyzed using Student's t-test and all the qualitative data using Chi-square test. Results: Heart rate in the control group was significantly higher than the study group during intraoperative period. Mean pain scores in the early postoperative period were significantly higher in control group than the study group (P < 0.001). Mean time of first rescue analgesic in the postoperative period was 149.17 min and 34.33 min in the study group and control group, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Hence, we conclude that administration of 8 mg of preoperative i.v dexamethasone was effective in reducing intraoperative and early postoperative pain in the lumbar spine surgery.

Keywords: Analgesia, dexamethasone, postoperative pain


How to cite this article:
Sharma M, Gupta S, Purohit S, Goyal AK. The effect of intravenous dexamethasone on intraoperative and early postoperative pain in lumbar spine surgery: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Anesth Essays Res 2018;12:803-8

How to cite this URL:
Sharma M, Gupta S, Purohit S, Goyal AK. The effect of intravenous dexamethasone on intraoperative and early postoperative pain in lumbar spine surgery: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Anesth Essays Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 23];12:803-8. Available from: http://www.aeronline.org/text.asp?2018/12/4/803/247632


   Introduction Top


The surgical procedures of the spine are generally associated with intense pain in the postoperative period. Adequate analgesia in the postoperative period is the key for improved outcome in terms of comfortable stay in hospital, early ambulation, and early discharge and for preventing the development of chronic pain. Multiple groups of analgesics are available for postoperative analgesia with their inherent advantages and disadvantages which restrict their universal applicability.[1] Therefore, multimodal analgesia has been suggested to mitigate pain and reduce side effects.

Glucocorticoids by their strong anti-inflammatory effect have shown to reduce pain in the postoperative period. Dexamethasone is a powerful anti-inflammatory drug with long half-life and may be useful in lowering postoperative pain when used as a part of multimodal analgesia.[2] Previous studies have investigated the potential analgesic effect of single perioperative intravenous (i.v.) dose of dexamethasone in many surgeries. Waldron et al. performed a systemic review to evaluate impact of a single i.v. dose of dexamethasone on postoperative pain and adverse events with this treatment. A single i.v. perioperative dose of dexamethasone had small but statistically significant analgesic benefits. Doses of dexamethasone ranged from 1.25 to 20 mg, with 8 mg being the most commonly used dose.[3] We hypothesized that the simple and inexpensive use of preoperative dexamethasone at low dose would be effective in reducing pain after lumbar spine surgery. With this background, we planned to evaluate the effect of single i.v. dose of dexamethasone on intraoperative and early postoperative (6 h) pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.


   Materials and Methods Top


This hospital-based, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with due permission from the institutional ethics committee and research review board and with written informed consent. The sample size was calculated to be 25 subjects in each of the two group at α (alpha) error 0.05 and power 80% assuming detectable difference in the mean pain score to be 1.7 and standard deviation (SD) 2.1 as per the reference article.[4] Hence, for the study purpose, 30 subjects in each of the two groups of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I and II patients between the ages of 18 and 70 years undergoing lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. The exclusion criteria were history of taking steroids, anticipated difficult intubation, deaf and dumb patient, and duration of surgery >3 h. Group A received dexamethasone (8 mg) 2 mL i.v. and Group B received 2 mL normal saline i.v. The randomization was done by a computer-generated random number table, and the random numbers were kept in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes. Envelope was opened and the patient was allocated to one of the two groups (according to the random number table) before shifting inside the operation room. Anesthesiologist assessing the analgesic effect and patients were blinded to the allocated group. Each patient had a preanesthetic checkup. All patients were explained about the anesthetic technique and verbal rating scale (VRS) for pain, in which 0 means no pain and 10 means worst imaginable pain.[5] Each patient was kept overnight fasting. On arrival in the operation theater, standard monitoring devices including electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure (BP), and pulse oximetry were attached. Baseline parameters (heart rate [HR], systolic BP [SBP], diastolic BP [DBP], and mean arterial pressure [MAP]) were also recorded. Two i.v lines were secured and Ringer lactate drip was started. The study drug was prepared in identical syringes of 2 mL for each group.

Randomized group allocation and study drug preparation in identical syringes were done by the person not involved in the study. Each patient was premedicated with glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg i.v. + midazolam 1 mg i.v. + fentanyl 1.5 mg/kg i.v. The study drug was administered according to group allocation. Any complaint of perineal pruritus was recorded. The patient was preoxygenated for 5 min before starting induction. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg i.v. in both groups. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg i.v. was administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Intubation was done with cuffed endotracheal tube of appropriate size after direct laryngoscopy. Anesthesia was maintained with 50% N2O in oxygen and 1–2.5% sevoflurane. Ventilation was volume controlled, tidal volume was kept between 8 and 10 ml/kg, and respiratory rate was set to achieve normocapnia (EtCO2 30–40 mmHg). Intraoperative monitoring included electrocardiography, noninvasive BP, pulse oximetry, and capnography. If hemodynamic variables (HR, BP) escalated above 20% of baseline value, bolus dose of fentanyl 30 μg i.v. was given. HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP were recorded at regular interval. Number of the patients who required additional dose of fentanyl was recorded. Reversal was done with neostigmine 2.5 mg i.v. + glycopyrrolate 0.5 mg i.v. only after onset of spontaneous respiration.

Extubation was done when fully satisfied with patient recovery according to the standard criteria.

Pain assessment was done by VRS score, in which 0 means no pain and 10 means worst imaginable pain.[5] VRS was taken 5 min after extubation (0 h). Then, the patient was shifted to recovery room. VRS reading was taken at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 6 h postoperatively. Rescue analgesia with diclofenac sodium 75 mg i.m. was given if patient had VRS score of three or above. Time of first rescue analgesic in the postoperative period was noted.

Blood sugar was checked at 6 h and 24 h postoperatively for hyperglycemia.

Each patient was followed up for 7 days postoperatively for wound healing. If healing did not occur within 7 days, it was labeled as delayed wound healing.

Statistical analysis

All the data were entered into a Microsoft Excel Spread Sheet and were analyzed statistically using Primer software and XLstat (Addinsoft 40, rue Damrémont 75018 Paris, France). All the quantitative data were summarized in the form of mean ± SD. The difference between mean values of both groups was analyzed using Student's t-test. All the qualitative data (sex and ASA class) were summarized in the form of number and percentage. The differences between proportions were analyzed using Chi-square test. The levels of significance and α error were kept 95% and 5%, respectively, for all statistical analysis. P < 0.05 was considered significant and P > 0.05 as nonsignificant.


   Results Top


There were no dropouts, and all patients completed the study. The two groups were comparable for demographic data and baseline variables [Table 1]. No statistical difference was observed between ASA status and baseline hemodynamic variables. Average duration of surgery was also not significantly different between the two groups.
Table 1: Demographic data and other baseline variables

Click here to view


Intraoperative pain was assessed on the basis of hemodynamic parameters. HR in the control group was significantly higher than study group during intraoperative period [Figure 1]. SBP, DBP, and mean arterial BP were comparable in two groups with statistically insignificant difference.
Figure 1: Graph showing the trend of heart rate at different time intervals

Click here to view


Ten patients (33.33%) in Group A and 25 patients (83.33%) in Group B required rescue analgesic during intraoperative period. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). VRS score for pain during postoperative first 2 h were significantly higher in the Group B than Group A, and the difference in mean VRS score was statistically significant (P < 0.001) up to 2 h. At 6 h, the difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant [Figure 2] and [Table 2]. The mean time to first rescue analgesic in minutes and SD in Group A was 149.17 ± 113.09 and in Group B was 34 ± 33.08. The statistical analysis revealed significant difference between two groups (P < 0.001) [Figure 3], [Table 3].
Figure 2: Graph showing verbal rating scale score for pain in the postoperative period

Click here to view
Table 2: Verbal rating scale score for pain in postoperative period

Click here to view
Figure 3: Graph showing time of first rescue analgesic in postoperative period

Click here to view
Table 3: Time of first rescue analgesic in postoperative period

Click here to view


Five patients in Group A and none of patients in Group B complained of perineal pruritus just after administration of the study drug. Blood sugar level was higher in Group A than Group B at 6h and 24 h, but difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.202 and P = 0.465). None of the patients had delayed wound healing in both the groups.


   Discussion Top


This study demonstrates that preoperative i.v administration of 8 mg dexamethasone significantly reduced intraoperative and postoperative pain and delayed the time to first analgesic dose in the postoperative period. A number of recent studies have investigated the potential analgesic benefit of a single perioperative dose of dexamethasone on postoperative pain and some of them have inconclusive findings.[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11]

Steroid therapy has been postulated to reduce inflammation and scar tissue formation that contributes to postoperative pain.[1] The analgesic effects of glucocorticoids are mainly provided through the peripheral inhibition of phospholipase enzyme, thereby decreasing the products of the cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways in inflammatory response. Apart from anti-inflammatory effects, steroids supposedly decrease the release of substance P at dorsal root ganglion which may further contribute to its analgesic effect.[12]

Steroids along with local anesthetics have been applied by many neurosurgeons to decrease postoperative pain following lumbar discectomy to reduce traumatic nerve root inflammation.[2] Watters et al.[13] used oral and i.v. dexamethasone and suggested that it is safe and effective adjunct in the postoperative management of primary lumbar disc surgery. In our study, we used single dose of i.v. dexamethasone preoperatively. Aminmansour et al.[14] had revealed that intraoperative administration of very high dose of (40 mg) dexamethasone reduced radicular pain and opioid requirement following surgery for herniated disc. Karst et al.[15] found that patients who had been treated with dexamethasone (20–80 mg) intraoperatively required less postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and had lower pain scores than a group without such treatment. Our results coincide with their results though we used lower dose of dexamethasone (8 mg). Tolver et al.[16] failed to show any clinical effect of dexamethasone on early postoperative pain following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. The authors attributed this effect to suboptimal dosage (8 mg) and timing (median times 37 min before skin incision) of administration of dexamethasone. On the contrary, same 8 mg of dexamethasone has been found to be sufficient to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy,[6],[17],[18] laparoscopic hysterectomy,[7] molar tooth extraction,[19] and mastectomy.[20] Dexamethasone modulates the inflammatory stress response by inhibitory pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukins, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor α, and leukocyte receptors, but laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair as a minimally invasive procedure may not induce a high inflammatory stress response, resulting in the effects of dexamethasone being clinically insignificant.

Jokela et al.[21] performed a dose-ranging study in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy and demonstrated that high dose of dexamethasone (15 mg) had an apparent opioid-sparing effect but no effect on VAS scores of pain and time to first rescue analgesic. This could possibly be due to the use of PCA for postoperative pain management, which allowed the patients to dose the opioid to the level of pain relief they desired. Another possible reason for the lack of effect of dexamethasone on pain score in their study can be low degree of invasiveness and weak inflammatory response of laparoscopic procedure as compared to open surgery.

The onset of action of dexamethasone is thought to be 1–2 h allowing time to diffuse across the cell membrane and alter gene transcription. Waldron et al.[3] suggested that administration of steroid 60 min before surgical trauma may be important in minimizing pain and inflammation. The timing of administration varies in different studies from 2 h before induction[17] to immediately before induction.[4],[22],[23] Some authors have given it postoperatively.[24]

The optimal analgesic dose of dexamethasone has not been determined yet. Many randomized trials and meta-analyses have recommended 8 mg of dexamethasone (i.v.) for postoperative analgesia.[3] Jokela et al.[21] studied three different doses to identify the effective analgesic dose of dexamethasone after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Asad and Khan[4] suggested that different surgeries may require different doses depending upon the tissue trauma so that the dose that is adequate for one procedure may not be enough for another. In our study, 8 mg dexamethasone was sufficient to reduce intraoperative and early postoperative pain.

Time of first rescue analgesic requirement in the postoperative period was significantly higher in Dexamethasone group than control group. Mean HR and MAP were also significantly higher in control group during postoperative period. Waldron et al.[3] performed a systemic review and meta-analysis and found that patients treated with dexamethasone had a significantly longer time to first dose of analgesic.[7],[21],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29] However, Jokela et al.[21] found that time to the first rescue analgesic dose was equal in all the four study groups.

It was observed that the mean HR and requirement of rescue analgesic during intraoperative period were significantly more in the control group. Thus, the trend of hemodynamic variables during intraoperative and postoperative period also supported the analgesic effect of dexamethasone. Our results are comparable to AsadandKhan.[4]

Five patients in the study group complained of perineal pruritus just after injection of dexamethasone. Perineal pruritus is an unusual reaction which may occur immediately after bolus injection of dexamethasone sodium phosphate. Perron et al.[30] also observed similar finding in their study. The pharmacological phenomenon could be related to the phosphate ester of the corticosteroid since perineal irritation has been described with hydrocortisone-21-phosphate sodium and prednisolone phosphate.[31] Fortunately, this adverse effect can be diminished or even abolished by giving dexamethasone diluted in 50 mL of fluid over 5–10 min.[31],[32],[33] None of the patients had any adverse effects related to rise in blood sugar or infectious complications. Glucocorticoids can give a marked but transient elevation in blood glucose.[34] However, in our study, administration of dexamethasone was not associated with a significant rise in blood sugar. None of the patients had delayed wound healing in both the groups. Waldron et al.[3] also reported the same. Most evidence in the literature also indicates that single doses of corticosteroids are unlikely to impair wound healing in man.[35]

Limitations of the study were that patient satisfaction and dynamic pain were not observed. We used a simple method of assessment for administrating the additional intraoperative analgesia. The management of postoperative pain in the developing countriesbecome difficult due to erratic availability of potent narcotic analgesic drugs and their derivatives. Dexamethasone is easily available, which when used as a co-analgesic reduces the narcotic dose requirement.


   Conclusion Top


We conclude that preoperative i.v. dexamethasone (single dose) is effective in reducing intraoperative pain and maintaining good analgesia in early postoperative period after lumbar spine surgery without apparent side effects.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the Neurosurgery Department, SMS Medical College, Jaipur.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Bajwa SJ, Haldar R. Pain management following spinal surgeries: An appraisal of the available options. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2015;6:105-10.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Salerno A, Hermann R. Efficacy and safety of steroid use for postoperative pain relief. Update and review of the medical literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1361-72.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Waldron NH, Jones CA, Gan TJ, Allen TK, Habib AS. Impact of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia and side-effects: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2013;110:191-200.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Asad MV, Khan FA. Effect of a single bolus of dexamethasone on intraoperative and postoperative pain in unilateral inguinal hernia surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015;31:339-43.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Aicher B, Peil H, Peil B, Diener HC. Pain measurement: Visual analogue scale (VAS) and verbal rating scale (VRS) in clinical trials with OTC analgesics in headache. Cephalalgia 2012;32:185-97.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Fukami Y, Terasaki M, Okamoto Y, Sakaguchi K, Murata T, Ohkubo M, et al. Efficacy of preoperative dexamethasone in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized double-blind study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009;16:367-71.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Thangaswamy CR, Rewari V, Trikha A, Dehran M, Chandralekha. Dexamethasone before total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled dose-response study. J Anesth 2010;24:24-30.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Feroci F, Rettori M, Borrelli A, Lenzi E, Ottaviano A, Scatizzi M, et al. Dexamethasone prophylaxis before thyroidectomy to reduce postoperative nausea, pain, and vocal dysfunction: A randomized clinical controlled trial. Head Neck 2011;33:840-6.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bianchin A, De Luca A, Caminiti A. Postoperative vomiting reduction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with single dose of dexamethasone. Minerva Anestesiol 2007;73:343-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Bilgin TE, Birbicer H, Ozer Z, Doruk N, Tok E, Oral U. A comparative studyof the antiemetic efficacyof dexamethasone, ondansetron, and metoclopramide in patients undergoing gynecological surgery. Med Sci Monit 2010; 16: CR336–41  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lee Y, Lai HY, Lin PC, Lin YS, Huang SJ, Shyr MH, et al. A dose ranging study of dexamethasone for preventing patient-controlled analgesia-related nausea and vomiting: A comparison of droperidol with saline. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1066-71, table of contents.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wong HK, Tan KJ. Effects of corticosteroids on nerve root recovery after spinal nerve root compression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;403:248-52.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Watters WC 3rd, Temple AP, Granberry M. The use of dexamethasone in primary lumbar disc surgery. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:440-2.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Aminmansour B, Khalili HA, Ahmadi J, Nourian M. Effect of high-dose intravenous dexamethasone on postlumbar discectomy pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:2415-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Karst M, Kegel T, Lukas A, Lüdemann W, Hussein S, Piepenbrock S, et al. Effect of celecoxib and dexamethasone on postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery. Neurosurgery 2003;53:331-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tolver MA, Strandfelt P, Bryld EB, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Randomized clinical trial of dexamethasone versus placebo in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2012;99:1374-80.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Karanicolas PJ, Smith SE, Kanbur B, Davies E, Guyatt GH. The impact of prophylactic dexamethasone on nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2008;248:751-62.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Preoperative dexamethasone improves surgical outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 2003;238:651-60.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Baxendale BR, Vater M, Lavery KM. Dexamethasone reduces pain and swelling following extraction of third molar teeth. Anaesthesia 1993;48:961-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Fujii Y, Nakayama M. Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting and analgesic requirement with dexamethasone in women undergoing general anesthesia for mastectomy. Breast J. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):564-7. Retraction in: Breast J. 2017 Jan;23 (1):120.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Jokela RM, Ahonen JV, Tallgren MK, Marjakangas PC, Korttila KT. The effective analgesic dose of dexamethasone after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2009;109:607-15.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Worni M, Schudel HH, Seifert E, Inglin R, Hagemann M, Vorburger SA, et al. Randomized controlled trial on single dose steroid before thyroidectomy for benign disease to improve postoperative nausea, pain, and vocal function. Ann Surg 2008;248:1060-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Al-Qudah M, Rashdan Y. Role of dexamethasone in reducing pain after endoscopic sinus surgery in adults: A double-blind prospective randomized trial. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010;119:266-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Numazaki M, Fujii Y. Reduction of postoperative emetic episodes and analgesic requirements with dexamethasone in patients scheduled for dental surgery. J Clin Anesth 2005;17:182-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Elhakim M, Nafie M, Mahmoud K, Atef A. Dexamethasone 8 mg in combination with ondansetron 4 mg appears to be the optimal dose for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 2002;49:922-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Liu K, Hsu CC, Chia YY. The effective dose of dexamethasone for antiemesis after major gynecological surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1316-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Gautam B, Shrestha BR, Lama P, Rai S. Antiemetic prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting with ondansetron-dexamethasone combination compared to ondansetron or dexamethasone alone for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2008;6:319-28.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Nesek-Adam V, Grizelj-Stojcić E, Rasić Z, Cala Z, Mrsić V, Smiljanić A, et al. Comparison of dexamethasone, metoclopramide, and their combination in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2007;21:607-12.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Coloma M, White PF, Markowitz SD, Whitten CW, Macaluso AR, Berrisford SB, et al. Dexamethasone in combination with dolasetron for prophylaxis in the ambulatory setting: Effect on outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1346-50.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Perron G, Dolbec P, Germain J, Béchard P. Perineal pruritus after i.v. Dexamethasone administration. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:749-50.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Thomas VL. More on dexamethasone-induced perineal irritation (Letter). N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1643–4.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Andrews D, Grunau VJ. An uncommon adverse effect following bolus administration of intravenous dexamethasone. J Can Dent Assoc 1986;52:309-11.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Czerwinski AW, Czerwinski AB, Whitsett TL, Clark ML. Effects of a single, large, intravenous injection of dexamethasone. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1972;13:638-42.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Holte K, Kehlet H. Perioperative single-dose glucocorticoid administration: Pathophysiologic effects and clinical implications. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:694-712.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Sauerland S, Nagelschmidt M, Mallmann P, Neugebauer EA. Risks and benefits of preoperative high dose methylprednisolone in surgical patients: A systematic review. Drug Saf 2000;23:449-61.  Back to cited text no. 35
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed79    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded12    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal