Anesthesia: Essays and Researches  Login  | Users Online: 875 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Home | About us | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Search | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Copyright form | Subscribe | Advertise | Contacts
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 583-588

Evaluation of arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure differences during laparoscopic renal surgery in the lateral decubitus position


1 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Fortis Hospital Mohali, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
3 Department of Renal Transplant Surgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence Address:
Rajeev Chauhan
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_88_19

Rights and Permissions

Background: End-tidal carbon dioxide (PEtCO2) is a noninvasive reliable technique to measure arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) in the body under general anesthesia. However, gradient between PaCO2and PEtCO2(P[a-Et] CO2) is influenced by many factors. Aims: In the present study, we evaluated the changes in P (a-Et) CO2for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in lateral decubitus position (LDP). Settings and Design: This was an observational, double-blinded, tertiary care center-based study. Methods: Thirty-one American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and Class II patients of either sex undergoing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in LDP under general anesthesia were included. An arterial cannula was inserted, PaCO2was measured at eight predesignated time intervals, and PEtCO2was also noted at the corresponding time period. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance for repeated measurements using one dependent variable and one within-subject factor (time). Quantitative data were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range, as appropriate. Results: The mean P (a-Et) CO2gradient was 5.67 ± 1.36 mmHg 10 min after induction of anesthesia in the supine position (T1a). Ten minutes after LDP, P (a-Et) CO2gradient was 7.38 ± 1.45 mmHg (T1b) and was higher than T1a. The P (a-Et) CO2values 10 min after release of pneumoperitoneum and 10 min after making the patient supine were significantly higher than the T1a value. The highest value of P (a-Et) CO2gradient was at 30 min after creation of pneumoperitoneum (T30), i.e., 9.99 ± 1.70 mmHg. Pearson's correlation coefficient showed that the degree of correlation varied considerably during surgery due to interindividual variability (R2 T1a vs. T60 was 0.61 vs. 0.17). Conclusions: PEtCO2does not reliably predict PaCO2in healthy patients scheduled for laparoscopic renal surgery in LDP.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed130    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded9    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal