Anesthesia: Essays and Researches  Login  | Users Online: 138 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Home | About us | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Search | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Copyright form | Subscribe | Advertise | Contacts
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Comparative evaluation of the effects of pregabalin, dexmedetomidine, and their combination on the hemodynamic response and anesthetic requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized double-blind prospective study


 Department of Anaesthesia, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Vandana Talwar,
A1/43, Azad Apartments, Sri Aurobindo Marg, New Delhi - 110 016
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_86_19

Background: In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of premedication with dexmedetomidine, pregabalin, and dexmedetomidine-pregabalin combination for attenuating the haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation and pneumoperitoneum (primary outcome), and for reducing anaesthetic requirement (secondary outcome) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Ninety ASA physical status classes I-II patients, between 18 to 65 years of age, of either sex, scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this randomised double blind study. Morbidly obese patients and those with history of hypertension, cardiac, renal, hepatic, endocrine or pulmonary dysfunction were excluded. Patients were randomized to three groups – Group P- received oral pregabalin (150 mg) one hour before induction and 100 mL of i.v normal saline (0.9%) over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction; Group D- received i.v dexmedetomidine (1 μg.kg−1) prepared in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline and given over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction, and an oral placebo tablet one hour before induction; and Group C-received a combination of oral pregabalin 75 mg one hour before induction, and IV dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg.kg−1) prepared in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline over 10 minutes, 10 minutes before induction. Results: Dexmedetomidine significantly attenuated the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation and pneumoperitoneum and reduced anaesthetic requirement as compared to the other two groups. Dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly lower mean arterial pressures and higher sedation score in the preoperative and postoperative period and significantly lower heart rate and arterial pressures and reduced anaesthetic requirement in the intraoperative period as compared to the other groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is a valuable adjunct to the technique of balanced anaesthesia for maintaining haemodynamic stability.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Vijayan NK
    -  Talwar V
    -  Dayal M
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed119    
    PDF Downloaded6    

Recommend this journal