Anesthesia: Essays and Researches  Login  | Users Online: 111 Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Home | About us | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Search | Current Issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions | Copyright form | Subscribe | Advertise | Contacts


 
Table of Contents  
EDITORIAL
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 291-292  

Unfolding doctrines of modern anesthesia literature publication


Department of Anesthesia, Al Safwah Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication8-Sep-2015

Correspondence Address:
Mohamad Said Maani Takrouri
Department of Anesthesia, Al Safwah Center, Riyadh
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: Nil., Conflict of Interest: There are no conflicts of interest.


DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.161804

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Takrouri MS. Unfolding doctrines of modern anesthesia literature publication. Anesth Essays Res 2015;9:291-2

How to cite this URL:
Takrouri MS. Unfolding doctrines of modern anesthesia literature publication. Anesth Essays Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Jan 17];9:291-2. Available from: https://www.aeronline.org/text.asp?2015/9/3/291/161804



The impact of introducing inhalational anesthesia in surgery was a great step of humanity medical advances. Later when anesthetists and anesthesiologists grow in number and expectations, the situation turned into momentum project to understand physiology, chemistry, and pharmacology to higher horizons never seen before. This was first doctrine; that anesthesia was founded on science, which created the environment of innovation in all aspect of medicine. The second doctrine was the presence of scientific media which came to notice by accident in Boston nitrous oxide floricks in the eyes of Horace Wells into experimental science depended on researches in physiology of respiratory, cardiovascular systems and in particular and in nervous system and pain physiology and pharmacology.

The scientific motivation of anesthesia offered to scientist made health care more as scientific practice in institutions. Wars can tell you what anesthesia can offer to humanity and what happen in the war zone of killing, suffering and extra fire and extra destruction to all science build for good living of humanity, and beyond. Some stories of this anti-medicine and anti-anesthesia are present outside medical press in newspapers and human rights organization observations on victims. System would be corrupted, and chaos would prevail. Now the anesthesiologist is practicing in opposite circumstances. Definitely, he is geared to save lives, maintain an airway and ventilation and give blood replacement and revival medications. The third doctrine is the practicing anesthesiologist. The background of the practice is attitudes and ethics.

The doctrine to come is supporting industries helping to improve life and protecting newborns to get out safely from the intrauterine life to childhood or anesthetic machines with supporting measurement of vital signs and other helpful devices. Pharmaceutical industries are a right arm to the anesthesiologist and researching for better designed drugs or more practical solutions to help disturbed physiology by medical and nonmedical means constitute another doctrine.

The foundation doctrines in highly developed anesthesia science project exactly and in same power on researchers and publishers in anesthesia. Doctrine for individual researcher quality, his attitude toward science and patient rights and safety. The doctrine of scientific knowledge is guaranteed to match the exponential growth of anesthesia literature to govern scientific facts by tested evidence-based science, which reflect on improvement of clinical practice by clinical management guidelines build on systemic reviews and meta-analysis studies.[1]

Modern literature anesthesia publishing cannot tolerate fabrications of data neither intellectual theft (plagiarism) of original ideas nor misconduct of publishing wrong data. The peer review and search for plagiarism and similar methods reduce but never cure this tendency.[2],[3],[4],[5],[6] Now indexing and quick retrieval of information gives wider spectrum of looking of the original of research idea and the waves of similar publications or variations on an original idea by testing different patches of patient or using it in different situations of surgery.

Despite all monitoring available to editors, the retraction of article of defaming a researcher in an institute, due to misconducts is still read in scientific journals.[7] This is rather assuring that like given anesthesia it should carry a lot of examination and far more continuous monitoring. Many human factors counts but honesty, ethics, and searching for truth is the most important quality of anesthesiologists.

 
   References Top

1.
Takrouri MS. Evidence-based medicine and internet journal of health. Internet J Health 2005;5. Available from: https://www.ispub.com/IJH/5/1/4825. [Last accessed on 2015 Jun 05].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Juyal D, Thawani V, Thaledi S. Plagiarism: An egregious form of misconduct. N Am J Med Sci 2015;7:77-80.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Anstey A. Publish and perish: how plagiarism can penalize perpetrators. Br J Dermatol 2015;172:549-51.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Damineni RS, Sardiwal KK, Waghle SR, Dakshyani MB. A comprehensive comparative analysis of articles retracted in 2012 and 2013 from the scholarly literature. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015;5:19-23.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Eaton KA, Giannobile WV, Sourgen DL, Balaji SM, Honkala E, Lynch CD. Improving the quality of papers submitted to dental journals: Transcription of session for editors, associate editors, publishers and others with an interest in scientific publishing held at IADR meeting in Cape Town on Wednesday, 25 June 2014. J Dent 2015;pii: S0300-571200036-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wager E. Publication ethics: whose problem is it? Prilozi 2014;35:23-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Eldawlatly A, Shafer SL. Caveat lector. Saudi J Anaesth 2012;6:99-101.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1957    
    Printed53    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded124    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal